12 litigant v. Foshan Lighting compensation case was rejected by the second instance1

12 appellants and Appellee (The company) In the case of disputes over the liability for securities misrepresentation, it was not satisfied with the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court (2016)Yue 01 word early 5-Judgment of No. 16 civil judgment ( The 12 appellants asked our company to compensate them for 273 in the first instance. 360 thousand yuan, the first-instance judgment dismissed the appellant's claim) To Guangdong province, recently, Foshan Lighting received a service from the Guangdong Provincial People's Court (2016)Yue Min end 1841- Legal document of civil judgment no 1852. 12 appellants and Appellee (The company) In the case of disputes over the liability for securities misrepresentation, it was not satisfied with the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court (2016)Yue 01 word early 5-Judgment of No. 16 civil judgment ( The 12 appellants asked our company to compensate them for 273 in the first instance. 360 thousand yuan, the first-instance judgment dismissed the appellant's claim), Appeal to the Guangdong Provincial People's Court ( Details see the company in November 23, 2016 published in the huge influx of information online of the litigation matters progress announcement (II)', Announcement Number: 2016-061). The Guangdong Provincial People's Court has made the following judgment on the appeal case: 1. Reject the appeal and uphold the original judgment. 2. The acceptance fee for the second instance case shall be borne by the appellant.