Approval of special funds for LED industry development is 'obstructed'
According to reports, taking advantage of the position of managing national special funds, Chen zhubing, the former director of the General Department of the enterprise department of the Ministry of Finance, asked the enterprise to withdraw the benefit fee according to 20 for each special fund distributed to the relevant enterprise, by this means, Chen zhubing illegally received a total of 24. 54 million yuan of corporate property alone or in collaboration with others.
The original intention of the government to set up special funds to support specific industries or industries is very good, but the opacity of management makes good things bad, breeds chaos and hidden rules, which not only wastes state funds, in fact, it also undermines the balance of market competition and even affects industrial development.
Li Xinghua, the director of the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Department, was found to be quite telling the problem. Li's fall and the Guangdong Provincial Finance invested 4.
0. 5 billion yuan is related to the shady scene of setting up special funds for the development of LED industry. Under the hidden rules, many LED enterprises are not doing their jobs and are bent on getting subsidies.
Huge subsidies are taken away by listed companies and state-owned enterprises with good government relations, while some enterprises that receive subsidies are even empty shells. At the same time, due to information asymmetry, some central enterprises do not even know the existence of certain policy subsidies.
In the absence of effective management, the more government subsidies, the greater the side effects. In recent years, typical counterexamples have occurred in the photovoltaic industry.
In the photovoltaic industry, excessive government subsidies have misled many enterprises. They are not striving to compete for the market, improve quality and reduce cost and selling price, but trying every means to please the government and blindly expand investment, in order to enter the subsidy list, the final photovoltaic industry has overcapacity and frequent problems.
In addition, it is worth reflecting on whether the government is reasonable to support a certain industry and subsidize specific enterprises.
In reality, enterprises that can obtain subsidies from government funds often have larger scales or have better relations with the government. After receiving subsidies, these enterprises have strengthened their competitive advantages, it has caused the phenomenon of strong and strong, and greatly suppressed the living space of those small and medium-sized enterprises.
Moreover, subsidized enterprises are also prone to trade disputes, and the recent Sino-European photovoltaic dispute is an example.
Under the market economy, the less government intervenes in the economy, the better, creating an equal competitive environment, levying reasonable tax burden and giving enterprises full freedom are good support for an industry.
In this sense, the practice of special funds to support specific industries is actually as small as possible.
Reduce subsidies, simplify the examination and approval of retained subsidy funds, strengthen supervision, and promote transparent operation, so as to cure the hidden rules of special fund examination and approval.